Prediction of Michelle Torres vs Betsy Nagelsen Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Torres vs B. Nagelsen

Michelle Torres

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Betsy Nagelsen

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Torres 1 - 0 Nagelsen

They have played 2 sets in total, with Michelle Torres winning 2 and Betsy Nagelsen winning 0. The last match between Michelle Torres and Betsy Nagelsen was at the Montreal, 15-08-1988, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Michelle Torres getting the victory 6-4 6-0.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Torres	1
Nagelsen	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R2) Montreal(08-15-88)

Stats

Michelle Torres

Betsy Nagelsen

M. Torres vs B. Nagelsen H2H Profile

M. Torres	Stats	B. Nagelsen
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
46.22% (104-121)	Career Total W/L	48.97% (356-371)
1	Hard	0
0	Titles	2
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. Torres vs B. Nagelsen Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Michelle Torres has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Betsy Nagelsen has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Michelle Torres, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Betsy Nagelsen has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Michelle Torres has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Betsy Nagelsen has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Michelle Torres has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Betsy Nagelsen winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Michelle Torres has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 35/35), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/4). Betsy Nagelsen has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 89/59), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 45% (W/L 90/108).
Player level: In the last year, Michelle Torres has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Betsy Nagelsen has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Michelle Torres winning 1 times and Betsy Nagelsen being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Michelle Torres winning 2 and Betsy Nagelsen winning 0.
The last match between Michelle Torres and Betsy Nagelsen was at the Montreal, 15-08-1988, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Michelle Torres getting the victory 6-4 6-0.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Michelle Torres has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Betsy Nagelsen has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Michelle Torres has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Betsy Nagelsen has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Michelle Torres has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Betsy Nagelsen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Michelle Torres vs Betsy Nagelsen Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Torres vs B. Nagelsen H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. Torres	Stats	B. Nagelsen
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	4
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

M. Torres Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Unknown Tournament - 29-05-1989
R1 Kimiko Date KrummK. Date	L	5-7 6-3 6-0	Stats
Strasbourg - 22-05-1989
R3 Stacey MartinS. Martin	L	7-5 1-6 6-2	Stats
Houston - 24-04-1989
R3 Kathy Rinaldi StunkelK. Rinaldi	L	7-5 2-6 6-3	Stats
Amelia Island - 10-04-1989
R2 Donna FaberD. Faber	W	6-4 6-3	Stats
R3 Martina NavratilovaM. Navratilova	L	6-2 6-0	Stats

View All

B. Nagelsen Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Indian Wells - 21-02-1994
R3 Natalia ZverevaN. Zvereva	L	6-0 6-1	Stats
Budapest - 18-10-1993
Q1 Asa CarlssonA. Carlsson	L	6-1 6-4	Stats
Montpellier - 11-10-1993
R3 Natalia BaudoneN. Baudone	L	6-0 6-4	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 21-06-1993
Q2 Sophie AmiachS. Amiach	L	7-6 6-4	Stats
Q1 Alison SmithA. Smith	W	6-3 6-2	Stats

View All

M. Torres vs B. Nagelsen Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. Torres	Stats	B. Nagelsen
46.22% (104/121)	YTD Win/Loss	48.97% (356/371)
46.56% (237/272)	Sets Win/Loss	49.59% (850/864)
48.96% (2283/2380)	Games Win/Loss	49.70% (7950/8046)
50.00% (35/35)	Hard Win/Loss	45.45% (90/108)
48.24% (41/44)	Clay Win/Loss	46.81% (44/50)
28.57% (6/15)	Indoor Hard W/L	39.53% (51/78)
0.00% (0/4)	Grass Win/Loss	60.14% (89/59)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
343.08	Average Opponent Rank	203.59
0% (0/0)	Slam W/L	53.33% (8/7)
33.33% (2/4)	Challenger W/L	80.77% (21/5)
48.89% (22/23)	Futures W/L	37.74% (40/66)
46% (103/222)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	49% (348/712)
0% (0/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	100% (3/3)
78% (7/9)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	56% (5/9)
52% (32/61)	Deciding Set Win %	47% (128/273)
88% (94/83)	1st Set Won, Won Match	81% (348/281)
12% (94/11)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	19% (348/67)
16% (130/21)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	19% (373/72)